The Choi implanter is not a new device. I think DHI in Greece may be one of the few clinics that uses it. Other clinics looked into it, and eventually dismissed it as uneccessary or even gimmicky. It's supposed to streamline the process by automating it, but some clinics found the device was more trouble than it was worth... it actually took up more time than saving time. I suppose if DHI still uses it, they find it useful in some way, but it certainly isn't necessary.
I also object to calling it a "no-touch" device. Look, those grafts don't "dissect themselves" and they don't show up in the Choi implanter on their own. So how is that "no touch"?
I'm not saying the Choi implanter is bad, but I also don't think it will give you an advantage over a clinic with lots of experience doing high-quality transplants. Clinics doing high-end transplants are extremely rare, and items like the Choi should not be a factor in your decision. It's not going to enhance your appearance when you're through. If anything, it is supposed to speed up the procedure, which is to the benefit of the clinic, and which is not really a factor in quality of your results. If anything, I would like a clinic to slow down and take their time, not ram-rod me through (not that the Choi device allows for that, I'm speaking hypothetically).
I know NHI was looking into the Choi implanter and the carousel, and they eventually gave up on it... more trouble than it was worth. Look here for some general information on the Choi implanter, carousel, etc:
http://www.newhair.com/fut_transplantation/automated_devices.asp Keep in mind that the page was written a while back, when NHI was investigating the Choi pen, and thought it might be useful. Since then, they have dismissed it and continued to use the typical methods (device-free).
Anyway, these are my impressions of the Choi implanter and the No-touch method. If you decide to use DHI, that's your choice, but don't expect anything magical to happen as a result of this Choi implanter.