There is thousands of posts on this and other hair transplant message boards. Most say that the technique used by Woods is far superior and less evasive.

If Woods is so good surely this would put all other HT doctors out of business. I know the cost has a major contributing factor to why Woods isn't used, but is this the only reason?

Regards.

James.

ignorance is the other one

"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic''. Arthur C. Clarke

I do agree with what Mark said regarding cost but as carl mentioned about instrumentation, like everything else, they will fiqure out a way to speed things up. I am biding my time for FUE waiting, like Mark mentioned, for the docs to get experienced. I don't want to be a guinea pig. But I really feel that some day soon most people will be opting for FUE assuming the cost difference isn't significant.

O.K guys if you go to www.hairsite.com and hairtransplant forum go to link Franklins pictures.These are 2 weeks right out of surgery with head shaved.I also shaved down the donor site the night before the pictures were taken as I was going to the Woods conference and wanted to show the real senario.I did not take photos but you can get a general idea.Also if I ever need anymore work Woods says he can get 2 more procedures but says I should be set for awhile.