| OK, I think I figured out how to get my photos properly placed on here......so here we go. I received a 2200 HT in February 2006. This was my 2nd HT (previously had 2200 in Nov 04). I need some advise. Based on these pics, I really am not happy with my HT. My temple areas look worse that before.....and before you say it, it is NOT from further hair loss. I take propecia and I know that my hair losses in my temple areas stabilized (I was thin there before the HT). I think my doc concentrated too much on top instead of distributing more evenly. I think you can see the greater density on top. To be honest, my hair is shorter in the AFTER pics, but that is because the increased density on top forces me to keep it shorter. However , you "cut it", I think I look worse now. My doc says the pics look fine and and the difference is more a result of the angle of the pics. I don't believe there is any merit to that. I would appreciate your comments on this. These pics are 18 months post op.....I waited as long as possible before finally deciding to post pics and get additional advice. I really wanted to be as fair as possible. |
