Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
-star Rating Rate It!  Login/Join 
Real Hair Club Member
Posted
Has anyone ever heard or used the technique that is used by Elliott and True where they take metal pins that look like small nails and place them in the donor sites before the hair follical is transplanted? I was told that this "opens" the site so that the donor hair will go in easily. Seems like a lot of trauma to the recipiant site to me. Any feedback?
 
Posts: 10 | Location: San Jose, CA, USA | Registered: November 19, 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Celestial Follicle Club Member
Posted Hide Post
It's an outdated technique that should be avoided. Dr. True says he gave it up years ago.

The "dilators" are there to make the techs job easier. The problem is that a percentage of patients will have pitting or other problems like additional scarring, when this technique is used.

You don't want big holes to put the grafts in, you want the smallest possible grafts in the smallest possible holes.

Any doctor who still uses this technique is 10 years behind the times.
 
Posts: 1906 | Registered: August 13, 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Mentor Real Hair Club Member
Posted Hide Post
Very true. My recommended butchered from this site used a lighting blade ( makes a small rhumboid hole). The point is I am fair skinned so a larger hole did take more time to heal. Larger holes can leave noticable scarring. I had lateral slits from Dr. Jones and had no noticable scarring.
Don't use Dr. Gallagher from this site.
 
Posts: 472 | Registered: December 25, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Celestial Follicle Club Member
Posted Hide Post
Dr. Gallagher makes holes?

That is a major no-no.
 
Posts: 1906 | Registered: August 13, 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Real Hair Club Member
Posted Hide Post
I had this procedure done and in fact I do have some ugly scarring on my head. In fact it is right in the front where the hair line is most critcal. I went back to Dr. Elliott and they refused to correct it so now I feel like a total freak. Too shy to sue. Some docs have suggested that they can fix it. Would love to know if anyone else has had this repair work done?
 
Posts: 10 | Location: San Jose, CA, USA | Registered: November 19, 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Celestial Follicle Club Member
Posted Hide Post
"I went back to Dr. Elliott and they refused to correct it so now I feel like a total freak."

It doesn't sound like Dr. Elliott can stand behind his own work. What year was it when Dr. Elliot used the dilators on you?
 
Posts: 1906 | Registered: August 13, 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Real Hair Club Member
Posted Hide Post
Wow, how long ago did this happen? I just logged onto the website and read your post. I went to Dr Elliott several years ago and he didn't use these dilators you describe. Was it a long time ago? I actually had a great experience there. In fact, I was referred by a friend who went there and they had a great experience and great results, too. I have referred several clients who also had wonderful results. Dr Elliott is a very honest, easy going person. I am sure if you confront him with your feelings, he is the type of doctor to go out of his way for people. This doesn't seem like something he would do. Again, I have referred several who had a wonderful experience and great results.
quote:
Originally posted by arfy:
"I went back to Dr. Elliott and they refused to correct it so now I feel like a total freak."

It doesn't sound like Dr. Elliott can stand behind his own work. What year was it when Dr. Elliot used the dilators on you?
 
Posts: 7 | Registered: April 21, 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
M&M
Guru Real Hair Club Member
Picture of M&M
Posted Hide Post
Isn't it scary how some of the outdated procedures used to be?

Anyway, be wary of recommendations from people who don't truly know how state-of-the-art hair transplants can be today. To think, just over 6-months ago (before getting onto this site for the first time) I would have still recommended Bosley to friends! Why - you ask? Because I thought that what I received was as 'good as HT's got'. I mean, they grew, didn't they? How was I to know that 'virtually undetectable' has long since been replaced with 'fully undetectable' when one visits the likes of Shapiro, H&W, etc.


___________________________
1662 with Dr. Ron Shapiro - May 2006
M&M Weblog
 
Posts: 361 | Location: Canada | Registered: March 04, 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
My Hair Loss Weblog


Celestial Follicle Club Member
Picture of hairbank
Posted Hide Post
MattBBBB,

The date posted on this was 4/7/04 so it's been dead for awhile. Just wanted to point this out to you to help when you're searching the site.


Hairbank

1st HT 1-18-05 - 1200 FUT's
2nd HT 2-15-06 - 3886 FUT's Dr. Wong
3rd HT 4-24-08 - 2415 FUT's Dr. Wong

GRAND TOTAL: 7501 GRAFTS

current regimen: 1.25mg finasteride every other day

My Hair Loss Weblog

Disclaimer: I'm not a Doctor (and have never played one on TV Wink ) and have no medical training. Any information I share here is in an effort to help those who don't like hair loss.
 
Posts: 2184 | Location: Illinois | Registered: January 06, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community  
 


Copyright Media Visions 2001.