|
|
|
 |
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hair Restoration Research Forum Hair Restoration Questions and Answers Do most surgeons require a minimum number of graphs?|
Go
|
New
|
Find
|
Notify
|
Tools
|
Reply
|
|
|
Real Hair Club Member |
I'm a NW2 and I desperately want to get my temples filled in, and also some grafts on top behind my hair line. I've heard most surgeons have a minimum number of grafts they'll do or a minimum amount you have to spend. When I went to MHR they did nothing under $4000, which I found strange. I'm not going back by the way because I've heard about their negative reputation. The work I need seems to be minor and I don't want to spend more than I have to. So, are there surgeons out there that don't put a minimum requirement on procedures?
|
||
|
|
"Bringing objective,quality hair restoration information to your door" Celestial Follicle Club Member  |
Fl Boy
I think any ethical doctor will not base the surgery on a number but rather your needs. With FUE you can go pretty low because there is no true incision.. With strip , personally , I wouldn't go less than 1200 or so.. BUT first of course we need info on you .. Age? etc.. JOBI 1417 FUT - Dr. True 1476 FUT - Dr. True 2124 FUT - Dr. True My views are based on my personal experiences, research, and objective observations Total - 5017 FU's uncut! |
|||
|
Hard Core Real Hair Club Member |
Fl Boy,
Mrjb is correct that FUE lends itself to smaller procedures. I know Dr. Feller does lunchtime FUE of 200 grafts. I believe he can go as high as c1200 grafts with FUE. Bear in mind that FUE is more expensive than strip. I think Dr Fellers lunchtime FUE is $8 per graft. There are other recommended Drs. for FUE, check out the Coalition Surgeons on this site. Good luck. "Plan for the worst & hope for the best" |
|||
|
|
Mentor Real Hair Club Member |
Are you interested in a smaller session because you feel you will require only a few hundred grafts to meet your needs? Or are you simply trying to save money? If the former is case, I recommend you check out FUE for a small session. Dr. Rose performs this procedure, as do other reputable physicians, like Dr. Feller and Dr. Harris. If the later is the case, it is probably better if you wait, save the money, and try to meet your goals in a single session if possible.
This is only general advice, as I do not know the intimate details of your medical history and hair loss situation Notice: I am an employee of Dr. Paul Rose who is recommended on this community. I am not a doctor. My opinions are not necessarily those of Dr. Rose. My advice is not medical advice. Dr. Rose is a member of the Coalition of Independent Hair Restoration Physicians. |
|||
|
|
Real Hair Club Member |
Thanks for the quick replies. First off I'm 26 and have been experiencing mild hair loss throughout my frontal region for about 6 years. I'd say my hair line has receded about 1/8 inch since the age of 19 and has also lost density. Basically, I just want to fill in my entire hair line and the temples as well. I want more density so I don't feel like I'm always having to style my hair to cover the problem area.
I've been on propecia for 4 months and it seems to be doing its job. Now, I'm thinking of adding a topical to try and get some density back in the hair line. Minoxidil claims to not work on the hair line, but I've heard about many guys having good results. If that doesn't work I believe surgery is my only option. If I do have it done, I want everything completed in one session because in my opinion 700-800 is the max I would need to fulfill my goal. Money is an issue as well, but my hair is a bigger concern. FUE sounds more appealing, but the price deters me a bit. I guess what it comes down to is that I need to see a reputable surgeon and go from there. There's just so much going on in my life right now and it's difficult to allot time for this. |
|||
|
|
Mentor Real Hair Club Member |
2 things come to mind here:
1) Try the minox, you might be happily surprised. Some respond very well, even in the frontal area. 2) Get some opinions from the top surgeons. You may find that you need fewer or more grafts than you thought. This might inform your decision to go with FUE, strip, or to simply wait and really check out the medical therapy options instead of surgery. Notice: I am an employee of Dr. Paul Rose who is recommended on this community. I am not a doctor. My opinions are not necessarily those of Dr. Rose. My advice is not medical advice. Dr. Rose is a member of the Coalition of Independent Hair Restoration Physicians. |
|||
|
|
Celestial Follicle Club Member |
Anyone who needs less than 1000 grafts should only do fue sessions.
If your hairloss excellerates or you simply are not happy with the process, results, do not have money to continue treating your baldness, you can shave your head, or buzz down to a very low guard with the clippers. There is absolutely NO SURGEON in the WORLD who will put in writing that you will be able to shave down to a #1,2, or 3 guard after strip surgery. I hope you weigh my comments heavily. I would also contact Dr. Rose or the Hair Loss Cure and set up a consult. Thanks, J |
|||
|
|
Associate Publisher and Forum Moderator Follicular Grand Wizard  |
Fly Boy,
You've gotten some excellent advice here already. Minoxodil is certainly worth trying. I tend to agree that anyone who needs less than 1000 grafts should consider FUE... However, try to remember that 1000 grafts or less will not make much of a cosmetic difference if spread out over a larger area. Also, I too would hope that a doctor would taylor to YOUR needs rather than have a minimum (or maximum) number of grafts per session. Elite and ethical physicans are more concerned about the patient's well being than their wallet. Falc To learn about how I restored my hair, read my hair restoration story with pictures. See also my hair loss weblog. Learn how Physicians are Recommend on this Community ------------- As of August 4th 2007 and after approximately 4000 posts as a free patient advocate - I am the Moderator and Associate Publisher of the Hair Transplant Network, the Coalition Hair Loss Learning Center and the Hair Loss Q & A Blog. Read the official announcement here. I am not a medical professional and my words should not be taken as medical advice. All opinions and views shared are my own. Learn how to subscribe to our community newsletters Proud Smile Club Member |
|||
|
|
Hard Core Real Hair Club Member |
I'm surprised nobody else has said this yet . . .
You're a 26yo guy with hair loss, and you want to get grafts below the NW#2 level? Risky. Ris-s-ky. I'm not saying you can't do it, but I'm saying that in most cases you shouldn't do it. If you still wanna pursue such a low hairline, then you need to be VERY realistic & far sighted with yourself about what your future loss pattern could be. Family history, miniaturization signs right now, etc. (And don't listen to Dr. Armani's clinic on this particular issue, either!) ------------------------------------------------ |
|||
|
|
Veteran Real Hair Club Member |
i would say a norwood 2 at the age of 26 is not so bad, especially since he said he saw his first loss of hair at 19
if u take 19 and go to 26, thats 7 years. with that being said there is a chance and probability he wont go too far down the norwood scale. remember i said probability, MPB is very spontaneis in which i mean in can be slow several years and just spook up on you. one thing is i dont think norwood 2 on a 26 year old is bad, its just maturity but if you do go on with your surgery just be prepared that you may several other surgeries in the future to catch up with your hairloss |
|||
|
|
Real Hair Club Member |
] My hair loss has been very slow, which is unusual, I think. As far as future surgery, I'm hoping that propecia will halt any further hair loss and I won't need more work. |
|||
|
|
Hard Core Real Hair Club Member |
Two comments:
-- I'm not saying that NW#2 at 26 is bad. I'm just saying that getting HTs for a sub-#2 appearance seems iffy at 26 years old. Getting a NW#2 hairline can look pretty natural even with some thinning showing later on. But if you're down in the NW#1 range, you look pretty weird with ANY signs of baldness showing later on in life. Getting a NW#1 at any age is really "swinging for the fence," so doing it at 26 seems risky to me. -- "As far as future surgery, I'm hoping that propecia will halt any further loss and I won't need work." Bad assumption. I'm not just being generally conservative again, I'm actually going off a lot of long-term users on this. Search the net, and you find lots of complaints that finasteride can begin losing its effectiveness after only 4-7 years. And even though this doesn't always happen, there are also a fair number of complaints that Fin's side effects are still worsening several years into usage. Fin is a good drug to have in the MPB arsenal, but I sure wouldn't bet on it to hold my MPB at any given point. It seems to be only a slowdown of MPB for several years, rather than a true stoppage. ------------------------------------------------ |
|||
|
|
Real Hair Club Member |
|
|||
|
| Previous Topic | Next Topic | powered by eve community |
 | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|
|||
| Site | The Hair Restoration Research Forum | ||
| Servlet | eve1da019 | ||
| Version | 1.3.0 build 9383 | ||
| Module | Forums 4.0.3 | ||
| Stylesheet | "Groupee Email Style" | ||
| Wordlet Set | "Default Wordlet Set" | ||
|
Hair Restoration Research Forum Hair Restoration Questions and Answers Do most surgeons require a minimum number of graphs?