Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
-star Rating Rate It!  Login/Join 
New Real Hair Club Member
Posted
Hello, I was wondering who some good/great doctors for fue are. I have done a lot of research online, but peoples opinions are often more helpful. Price and geographic location are not issues, I just want a quality procedure. Also, please take this opportunity to voice negative opinions about doctors and their FUE procedures...Thank You
 
Posts: 3 | Registered: April 23, 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Follicular Salvation Club Member
Picture of spex
Posted Hide Post
I have had personal experience with Dr Feller who i now showcase for in the u.k. I can't speak highly enough of him - he gave me my life back!

my pictures


I am a paid showcase and "patient coordinator" for Dr Feller, Coalition Member in the UK - all opinions expressed are my own.

My Weblog

HT Tips - Patience -Growth Times -8-16 Months - Hair Greed -Expectations

"Research-Research-Research"
 
Posts: 1575 | Location: U.K Consultant | Registered: November 24, 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Celestial Follicle Club Member
Picture of Jotronic
Posted Hide Post
If you're going to consider FUE, I'd say to give Dr. Feller a ring. He'll give it to you straight regarding FUE and it's merits.


I am employed by Hasson & Wong, on salary, not commission. My opinions are my own. Beware of deceptive photo tactics used by clinics with both flash and studio lighting. Photo gallery patients are not models.

Dr. Hasson and Dr. Wong are members of the Coalition of Independent Hair Restoration Physicians
 
Posts: 1577 | Location: Seattle, Wa USA | Registered: January 28, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Real Hair Club Member
Posted Hide Post
specs...i dont now if you examined it (because its in a difficult place to examine), but what is the scarring like in the donor area, or in other words, how much do the holes from the punch shrink during the healing process.
 
Posts: 3 | Registered: April 23, 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Follicular Salvation Club Member
Picture of spex
Posted Hide Post
Indeed its a hard place to examine oneself but I have had 10's of guys closely examine my donor region as well as my recipient region and they have all commended me on how great it looks - it is impossible to see any scaring.

These pics are not of me but of another Feller patient.



I am a paid showcase and "patient coordinator" for Dr Feller, Coalition Member in the UK - all opinions expressed are my own.

My Weblog

HT Tips - Patience -Growth Times -8-16 Months - Hair Greed -Expectations

"Research-Research-Research"
 
Posts: 1575 | Location: U.K Consultant | Registered: November 24, 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Real Hair Club Member
Posted Hide Post
Wow...Dr Feller did a great job...I expected at least some scarring, but you have healed great...the higher price is definately worth it
 
Posts: 3 | Registered: April 23, 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
johnny69
Hard Core Real Hair Club Member
Posted Hide Post
Spex....how much time between the before/after pics you posted?
 
Posts: 141 | Registered: February 05, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Hard Core Real Hair Club Member
Posted Hide Post
Hey guys, i was wondering that with the new tricho technique for closing the donor area, is there really an overwhelming argument in favor of spending 3 or 4 times more money to go for FUE as opposed to strip? I would love some input from guys who have seen some results from both.

Thanks
 
Posts: 118 | Registered: November 22, 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Follicular Salvation Club Member
Picture of Dr. Alan Feller
Posted Hide Post
Paris,
One has nothing to do with the other. Tricho is not the panacea it is being made out to be. Yes, it is an improvement, but it is not scarless surgery. Tricho will minimize a scar's appearance IF, and only IF the scar is about 1-3mm. If the scar stretches beyond this, then tricho is uselss. That said, tricho should be performed on ALL strip patients to improve the chance of an undetectable scar.
If you need more than 400 or so grafts, then you should go for a strip and not FUE.
Dr Feller


Feller Medical, PC
Great Neck, NY
516-487-3797
 
Posts: 987 | Location: Great Neck, NY | Registered: October 05, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
My Hair Loss Weblog


Celestial Follicle Club Member
Picture of hairbank
Posted Hide Post
Paris,

This question has been debated over and over. I believe this is one of those things that purely comes down to personal preference.

IMO.....Trichophytic closure, while not scarless in most cases, makes the donor scar very difficult to detect in most HT cases. From what I've seen (and experienced so far since it was used during my 2nd HT), the results are very, very good. I expect to be able to confidently clip down to #2 guard (maybe #1) without detection. I think I could right now but I'm trying to let the hair grow a little after a recent HT. There have been a few results posted with Tricho where the scar was undetectable while combing through hair.

As for cost/benefit analysis of FUE/STRIP.........again, IMO, STRIP is the hands-down winner. I'm sure there are differing opinions on this and, to a degree, it depends on your prospective. I was a NW 4 (maybe 5) before my first and second HT's. FUE would have cost me a fortune if I would have attempted to restore my hair in that fashion. For a person who is NW1 or NW2, has the excess $$, and still has the idea they want to shave down after HT, maybe they opt for FUE?? Mind you I don't understand the whole concept of having a HT to then shave down Confused

The results depicted above for FUE are good, however if you look closely you can see little white dots where the grafts were extracted. I suppose, like STRIP scars, some will be better and some worse.

While it seems great strides are being taken to increase the graft survival percentage's for FUE........I'd still vote for STRIP as the most effective form of surgical hair restoration when it comes to cost and overall benefit.


Hairbank

1st HT 1-18-05 - 1200 FUT's
2nd HT 2-15-06 - 3886 FUT's Dr. Wong
3rd HT 4-24-08 - 2415 FUT's Dr. Wong

GRAND TOTAL: 7501 GRAFTS

current regimen: 1.25mg finasteride every other day

My Hair Loss Weblog

Disclaimer: I'm not a Doctor (and have never played one on TV Wink ) and have no medical training. Any information I share here is in an effort to help those who don't like hair loss.
 
Posts: 2183 | Location: Illinois | Registered: January 06, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Follicular Salvation Club Member
Picture of spex
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Spex....how much time between the before/after pics you posted?



I believe a couple of months - i remember reading. I know it was relatively soon after.

Here are a couple of others i found: approx 2 weeks post op after FUE with Dr Feller.




"Hairroot" 1233 grfts in one day session




Hope these help!
Spex


I am a paid showcase and "patient coordinator" for Dr Feller, Coalition Member in the UK - all opinions expressed are my own.

My Weblog

HT Tips - Patience -Growth Times -8-16 Months - Hair Greed -Expectations

"Research-Research-Research"
 
Posts: 1575 | Location: U.K Consultant | Registered: November 24, 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Hard Core Real Hair Club Member
Posted Hide Post
Dr. Feller,
Thanks for clearing that up. In a way, that was the point i was trying to make. for larger sessions, even FUE will leave scars enough so that one won't be able to shave, so that defeats the purpose completely. As far as the healing time for strip and FUE, i have heard latter heals somewhat faster. That would be one case in favor of FUE in my view, if the healing was significantly faster.

Thanks
 
Posts: 118 | Registered: November 22, 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community  
 


Copyright Media Visions 2001.