|
||||
Hair Restoration Research Forum
Hair Transplant Experiences and Surgeon Reviews
Nine Month Report|
Go
![]() |
New
![]() |
Find
![]() |
Notify
![]() |
Tools
![]() |
Reply
![]() |
|
|
Follicular Salvation Club Member |
Thats EXACTLY how I feel. Im here to help my balding brothers and thats it. Top 2-3 |
|||
|
|
My Hair Loss WebLog Follicular Salvation Club Member |
I'm not sure I would consider this thread a "travesty" or a...."witch hunt"....or that the people supporting....the patient....should be condescendingly asked to...."educate themselves".... .....
Follicular Reclamation Project: Dr. Feller, 3K, 1/8/08 Propecia 7x Nizoral 2%/Toppek S&C Rogaine Foam 5% (starting post-HT) Toco-8 Nanogen Hair Expander |
|||
|
|
Veteran Real Hair Club Member |
Well here comes the part where the doctor is defended by the backslappers, most of whom have never had a procedure performed by the said doc. And the patient is quietly dismissed as the panicky wolf cryer.
Let me get this straight. A patient who uses this board to express concern and doubt (about his/her own personal procedure, his/her own personal experience, his/her own results he/she lives with everyday) is now a smear merchant? I got the memo now. |
|||
|
|
"Bringing objective,quality hair restoration information to your door" Celestial Follicle Club Member |
The bottom line is it is 9 months.. You cannot judge a final result yet .. Not defending the doc just a well known fact. Some docs claim 14 months to 2 years even for final results for slow gorwers
If at the end of 14 months it is the same situation then start looking into soultions but until then its a mute point in my mind. Concern is one thing but prejuging is not fair to anyone including the patient. Blaming a quality doctor is not the answer. i'm sure Dr. Epstein would be open to speaking when the time comes. Surgery is NOT 100% and the patient needs to understand the risks. It's not like he is dealing with a poor doctor JOBI 1417 FUT - Dr. True 1476 FUT - Dr. True 2124 FUT - Dr. True My views are based on my personal experiences, research, and objective observations Total - 5017 FU's uncut! |
|||
|
|
Associate Publisher and Forum Moderator Follicular Grand Wizard |
Dear forum members,
I had a long and in depth conversation with Dr. Epstein this morning regarding TTDS and other patient concerns. I feel that the conversation was very helpful in getting an overall understanding of this situation and his practice. At the Hair Transplant Network, we work hard to make sure our physicians are held accountable and continue to perform state of the art results. In speaking with Dr. Epstein, it is obvious that he is very passionate about his work and has a heart for his patients. He also has an outstanding record of producing quality patient results and overall has been quite consistent. He realizes this situation is very upsetting to the patient and is very upset over it himself. As I have stated previously, the technicians can make or break a procedure and damaged grafts during the dissection process, holding process, or placement process can impact overall hair growth. Dr. Epstein reguarly oversees his staff and since this situation, he has been heavily scrutinizing their work even more than normal. Dr. Epstein firmly believes they are still performing the same high level of quality work that we expect from Dr. Epstein. Additionally, Dr. Epstein has personally invited Pat and me to come to visit his clinic anytime so that we can see for ourselves that he and his staff are still meeting our high level of expectations and standards of the Coalition. I still believe that Dr. Epstein is dedicated to performing state of the art hair transplantation and a high level of patient care. None of this however, changes the concerns of the patient, and at 9 months, clearly we all would have hoped to have seen better hair growth. But as tempting as it is to make a final judgment of the result today - giving this surgery not only a chance to fully mature which is highly important, but also giving Dr. Epstein the benefit of the doubt based on his proven track record. It would also be helpful to see before and immediately postoperative pictures so we can get an understanding of how far this patient has actually progressed. Recent pictures I have seen show hair in the front 2/3rd of the scalp with a completely bald crown. If all of this is transplanted hair, I'd suggest this patient is at 60 or 70% hair growth which is only slightly below the average. Based on Dr. Epstein's input and a photo outlining the frontal half where the work was to be performed in, he believes hair was at placed at least in this area but most likely went further back knowing full well that a second procedure was planned to increase overall hair density, making the transition from hair piece to hair transplant easier. I realize that this patient said that hair was transplanted in the frontal third, but I also know that sometimes it's hard to evaluate exactly how much of the scalp is 1/3, 1/2, etc. Immediately postoperative pictures would help give a more clear idea however, it does not appear that these are available. I have also talked to Dr. Epstein in detail and confirmed with a few other leading physicians including Dr. Ray Konior and Dr. Sharon Keene of the Coalition about the possibility of a hair piece slowing down or even more rarely stunting hair growth. I have also had confirmation from a hair transplant patient and former hair piece wearer that he too had delayed growth. Applying the hair piece too soon after surgery could potentially damage the grafts however, this is typically safe after about 10 days. There are variations in hair pieces, but sometimes wearing a hair piece especially regular use of one that is not well ventilated, can slow down and potentially even inhibit hair growth. Additionally, friction caused by the hair piece on the scalp can cause a temporary loss of those hairs affected. As a strange but accurate example of this, in the winter time, the hair on my legs is less dense because the friction of my pants against my leg causes temporary thinning of the hair. Regular wearing of a wig may also suffocate the hair follicles creating a problem with overall scalp circulation. It would be in TTDS' best interest therefore, to significantly minimize or eliminate the use of his hair piece and only wear one that is highly ventilated. Though in most cases, patients see good hair growth at 9 months, it is possible that TTDS is just a slow grower. This is not desirable, but it has happened before. Even Pat (our Publisher) experienced very delayed hair growth from his 4th hair transplant and saw significant improvement between 9 and 12 months. It should also be known that no physician can bat a 1000. For unknown reasons, sometimes a patient will just experience poor hair growth. Though physicians do everything they can to ensure this doesn't happen, researching any physician who is publicly transparent will lead you to patients who are less than satisfied with their results, even when the majority of the results are consistently positive. However, it is too early to determine whether or not this is a failed hair transplant. Regarding the other patients who are only at 6 months post-op, it's highly important to give the transplant a chance to fully mature before making an evaluation. I know it's discouraging, but read all the remarks to KevKristy from veteran members who state how normal this on the following thread. All we can do now is wait things out to see how his and other hair transplants progress. I encourage TTDS to remain in contact with Dr. Epstein so that he can help him through this. Though its preferable that the grafts grow in the first time, in the event that it is needed, Dr. Epstein will be more than willing to replace any grafts that don't grow for free. I hope and trust that our members will reserve judgment on Dr. Epstein who has an immpeccable record of producing state of the art results. Best wishes, Bill (Falceros) To learn about how I restored my hair, read my hair restoration story with pictures. See also my hair loss weblog. Learn how Physicians are Recommend on this Community ------------- As of August 4th 2007 and after approximately 4000 posts as a free patient advocate - I am the Moderator and Associate Publisher of the Hair Transplant Network, the Coalition Hair Loss Learning Center and the Hair Loss Q & A Blog. Read the official announcement here. I am not a medical professional and my words should not be taken as medical advice. All opinions and views shared are my own. Learn how to subscribe to our community newsletters Proud Smile Club Member |
|||
|
|
Follicular Salvation Club Member |
Why didn't Epstein inform TTDS this at the time of his surgery then? While the rest of it sounds calm, cool, and level headed....I dunno. Four or so patients who have significant concerns who are all at 6 months+ post op? They should be at 60% growth by now, let alone TTDS 9 month (?)...In addition, while post-op pics would be 'helpful' for TTDS, it really isn't that important, in that he was totally BALD prior to the procedure. We should be able to tell if 2,500 (or however many) grafts are growing out of his BALD head? What does it matter where they were placed? Unless Dr. E put them in his side burns or beard or something, it really doesn't matter---- he was *BALD*... It was previously sited that 4-5 patients w/poor growth a year is a "meager" 5% of his annual clientel; and that the 'x' factor was attributed to be the culprit, in discussions w/other experts in the industry (i.e. Feller & Matt Shapiro's patient educator) they claim there is NO 'x' factor, w/the exception of grafts "thinning" on those patients who have 'quirky' genes. Even still, it is no where near 5% (?)...and the 'thinning' phenomena is SURELY not what is happening w/these patients. they simply are not GROWING the grafts that were placed... Sure, it all sounds level-headed: we want to give him the benefit of the doubt, the patients aren't *fully* matured yet, etc. etc... -BUT- I dunno...four or five patients ALL w/the same problem, that is *no* growth, and one of them is already NINE months out? Most, if not all, of the grafts should already be visible on his scalp, they would merely not be matured yet...too many 'bad' coincedences as far as Im concerned... |
|||
|
|
Follicular Salvation Club Member |
Maybe all 4 wore a hairpiece
|
|||
|
|
Follicular Salvation Club Member |
|
|||
|
|
My Hair Loss WebLog Follicular Salvation Club Member |
Ya know, I don't believe that anyone should be crucified -- i.e., Dr. Epstein -- but I don't believe he has been. The vast majority of comments and concerns, if not all of them, have been pretty straightforward, inquisitive questions into the given cases, which are indeed startling given Dr. Epsteins "reputation" -- NG2GB's post above, included.
Sure, none of the people are fully *matured* (which is different from growth, and I'm not saying they are *fully* grown, either), and this should be taken into account as it is part of the whole picture; just like the fact that there are numerous cases of poor growth/results that have been presented, which should be taken into account. Any sort of conclusive judgement should, of course, be weighted against a ~12month result. At this point in time, I see a grouping of troubling cases, and some questions regarding the prevalence of "X factors", patient information, and graft growth n' quotes. Follicular Reclamation Project: Dr. Feller, 3K, 1/8/08 Propecia 7x Nizoral 2%/Toppek S&C Rogaine Foam 5% (starting post-HT) Toco-8 Nanogen Hair Expander |
|||
|
|
Follicular Salvation Club Member |
Hey TTDS WAS your piece one that could breathe?
Did you use clips or glue? How long after the procedure did you start wearing it? Does the piece move alot on your head ? Did Dr Epstein warn you about the possibilities of slow or no growth from wearing it? Alot of guys wear hats and bandanas for months but that doesnt inhibit growth. My suggestion to you is to shave you head to avoid the bozo look and start back up on the foam. The part Falc cited about the friction is real. Not convinced about the rest because there are ton of guys wore pieces after surgery and their growth was fine. Its impossible to determine whos fault this is but I would take the rug off and see what happens .What if you happen to be the RARE guy that gets no growth Do you want to go through other surgery for the hell of it. All you can do is give it some more time. I think the fact that a few others arent happy with their surgery concerns me .These were all done within months of each other. Obviously Dr Epstein hasnt dismissed my theory on the techs being the cause since I just read how hes really on their ass now. |
|||
|
|
Guru Real Hair Club Member |
Before you panic check out my pics. The first shots were taken in Dr Shapiros office 12 months post op of 1K grafts with Ivan Cohen. The second pic is taken 16 months post op. I doubt all of the regrowth was from foam and Propecia and also included the HT growing in. I have also thickened up quite a bit since the last photo was taken in Dec of 2007 and will have photos up soon taken from the same angle and lighting conditions http://hair-restoration-info.com/eve/forums/a/albumcomm...861/m/5281051253/p/1 |
|||
|
|
Guru Real Hair Club Member |
Hey guys.
I'm curious if any of the other docs would step in here and say if thay had any patients that had a similiar situation (slow growth at nine months)that don't post on this forum....I know that sounds silly...just a thought. Is Epstein the only doc ???? I agree with MRJB... anyone with growth issues at six months has to step back,relax and wait. It's just to early. I think lumping them in with our brother that has little growth at nine months should be re-thought. About the x-factor thing. Interesting that another doc would say there is no X-factor....i would like to learn more about this. If you look back in this thread I posted studies from Dr.Bernstein and Dr Rassman. In that PAGE 88 paragraph i left out exactly that. Quote: "causes for delayed growth have theoretical explanations(published in the literature as H- or X- factors),however this phenomenon is not well understood and is,fortunately ,uncommon" They then go on and mention these rare cases take between 12-24 months to grow and mature. And the patient may need additional work...an unlucky patient. I'm a Dr.Epstein patient but I gotta tell ya I wouldn't defend anything or anyone that's flat out wrong. I got a bit twisted after reading this thread about my own situation and requested my before photos from Epstein's office today...they e-mailed them an hour ago. I realize I'm only in the early stages(4 1/2 months)...but i gotta tell ya...it's a big difference. It took me to look at the old photos to see the difference...hairline is totally re-built. I know my happy story is not going to help our buddy at this moment...but maybe it will. It's hard to believe Dr.Epstein screwed up after 10,000 surgeries (just a guess on that amount :-) I think all of us would really like to know the truth. Is he that unlucky patient that just is going to take alot longer...I wonder....i hope this for him. Have any other docs experienced this before ??? He's what's important here. Hope I didn't put anyone to sleep...lol MH |
|||
|
|
Follicular Salvation Club Member |
stupid, but true thought:
I don't like the fact that the 'techs' were giggling trying to remember who danced w/who at the club the night before and how MANY *drinks* they had, perhaps they were still tipsy the next morning or had a horrific hang-over (?)... I would be shi$$ing in my pants and all over the dreaded CHAIR if I heard such a discussion while they were handling my precious follicles... I'd probably grab my grafts from them and run out the door w/my 5,000 bloody slits all over my head, run to AMPM buy some ice, and try and insert them myself... |
|||
|
|
Follicular Salvation Club Member |
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
You know theres a difference between slow growers and no growers. Even in very slow growers hairs still do sprout by at least 6 months .It may only be 20% but there is some growth. I also find it hard to believe that Epstein just all of a sudden lost his touch. If after 12 months these 3 or so complaints are still valid we would know that its was the fault of the clinic . Hopefully no ones at fault. At least you know hes got your back.Some places would just say go F yourself |
|||
|
|
Guru Real Hair Club Member |
If you post that again with the caps lock off and proper spacing maybe I will read it. |
|||
|
|
Guru Real Hair Club Member |
Yea I saw that top 2-3 qoute from DR E. I have been on forums for years and never even heard of the guy |
|||
|
|
Guru Real Hair Club Member |
I'm not defending him but DR E said 3-4 of the 500 patients he works on a year have problems so that would be less than 1% with growth issues not 5%. |
|||
|
|
Guru Real Hair Club Member |
Why would they be doing surgery on July 4th anyhow ? |
|||
|